"Guns can protect women: Advocate"
While I agree with the notion that women would be able to protect themself if they have the right tools/weapons to defend themselves, modelling ourselves after the United States is not the answer. While guns do not kill people, only people who abuse the use of guns; arming ourselves like a Canadian Rambo or slick hotshot will only create more anger, strife, and petty arguments over egos, territory, or material assets, which could escalate into someone losing their cool and simply pulling out a gun and pulling the trigger.
I think it is pretty arrogant of Sharon Gregson to position herself as some sort of femme gunslinger, which is signified on the Canadian Firearms journal. Self-Defense comes in alternative forms, so perhaps a debate will bring out other options, but Sharon, guns are not the answer. To be a microcosm of the arms conflict only exacerbates the global problems we as humans have with weapons that kill, just because someone can pull out a gun and pull a trigger or point it at a criminal. Criminals will always threaten our personal safety if we give then the opportunity to fight back like arat once we corner them. Gun or no gun, criminals are opportunists and will find away to evade the bullet if they use trickery to disarm their opponent
No comments:
Post a Comment